Many centuries ago in The Republic, Plato raised the question of whether it would be just to return a weapon to neighbor showing signs of mental illness. An article in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune raises this same question. Courts have recently ruled in favor of the gun rights of individuals with a history of serious mental illness. Do such decisions recklessly and needlessly endanger the public (and perhaps the ill person)? Or do those with a history of mental illness have a right to defend themselves and/or to overcome previous difficulties and regain their rights?
Archive of previous posts
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment